3 B2B April Fools Advertising Ideas
Most B2B April Fools campaigns are a tweet with a fake feature in it, posted at 9am and forgotten by lunch. The ones that land commit to a fake product hard enough that people genuinely cannot tell, then use the reveal to sell the real thing.
Three that did it properly, with what each one cost and what it returned.
| Campaign | Company | What they faked | Cost | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Action figure homepage takeover | PostHog | A toy line of tech archetypes | Video and design time, hand-painted figures | 24-hour takeover, organic reach, emails captured via prize draw |
| FigPals | Figma | A Furby-style companion for designers | A few hundred for a small toy run | A full parody toy ad designers loved |
| Fake job hop to Gong | Sybill | A resignation letter | Free, just writing time | 50k impressions, 525 likes, 372 comments |
1. PostHog turned its homepage into a toy commercial
PostHog took over its own homepage for 24 hours on April 1 with a fake physical product launch: a line of action figures based on tech archetypes, complete with a parody toy commercial and Figma-designed box art.
The detail that makes it work is that the figures were real. They hand-painted a small run for the shoot, then used them as a prize draw, which captured emails from everyone who entered. A joke with a working conversion mechanism attached.
Two things worth copying. They kept a path open to the normal homepage, so anyone who arrived wanting the actual product could still find it. And the founder posted in character about pivoting to toys, which is the part that sold the bit. A brand account making a joke is an ad. A founder committing to it is a story.
Roughly three weeks of production for the video, the design, and the landing page.
2. Figma built a Furby for people who live in Figma
FigPals was a Furby-style virtual companion for designers who spend all day in the tool, launched April 1 with a deliberately over-the-top toy commercial made with a real production house.
The insight underneath it is affection rather than promotion. FigPals is a joke about the loneliness and repetition of design work, made by people who clearly understand that work. Designers ate it up because it was made for them and not at them, which is a distinction most brand humour misses.
Cost was a few hundred dollars for a small run of the toys, plus the ad. The production quality is the joke, and cheaping out on it would have killed the bit.
3. Sybill announced a resignation that was actually a roast
The riskiest one here, and the cheapest. Collin Mayjack posted a straight-faced LinkedIn announcement saying he was leaving Sybill to join Gong, then used the body of the post to roast Gong's opaque pricing, slow release cadence, and tired category-leader positioning.
The next day he revealed it as an April Fools bit and pivoted the reveal into a demo event for Sybill against Gong.
50,000 impressions, 525 likes, and 372 comments off a single organic post that cost nothing but the time to write it.
It works because the satire reads as believable corporate-speak right up until the punchline, and the digs are specific enough that anyone who knows the category catches them. The risk is obvious. Name a competitor and you are one bad sentence from reading mean rather than funny. The follow-up handled that by staying warm, thanking the team, and moving straight to shipped features. Lead with the joke, close with the proof.
What separates these from a fake feature tweet
They build the thing. PostHog hand-painted real action figures. Figma produced real toys and hired a production house for the ad. The gap between describing a joke and manufacturing it is where all the credibility lives.
The joke is aimed at the audience, not at the product. FigPals is about how designers feel, not about what Figma does. Sybill's post is about a frustration buyers already share. The campaigns that fail are the ones where the punchline is a feature.
There is a mechanism attached. A prize draw capturing emails. A demo event the next day. A joke with no next step is just content, and both of these had somewhere for the attention to go.
The reveal is planned as carefully as the setup. Sybill's follow-up did more work than the original post. If you have not written the reveal, you have not finished the campaign.
Committing is the entire strategy. All three are cases of somebody refusing to half-do a bit, which is also the difference between guerrilla marketing that works and guerrilla marketing that is merely cheap.
If you are planning one for next April
Start in February. Two of these took around three weeks of production, and the ones that read as effortless took the longest.
Pick a fake product that says something true about your users. Build at least one physical or functional piece of it. And decide what the reveal converts into before you write the joke, because the reveal is where the campaign either pays for itself or does not.
More plays like these are in the guerrilla marketing roundup, and the mechanics behind why they spread are covered in earned media.
If you steal one, steal this
If you steal one, steal Sybill's fake resignation. It cost nothing but writing time and pulled 50,000 impressions and 372 comments from a single LinkedIn post, because the satire was believable enough to fool people and specific enough to be funny. The reveal did the selling. Build the joke around a frustration your buyers already share.
FAQ
- Do April Fools campaigns work for B2B?
- Yes, when the fake product is built rather than described. PostHog hand-painted real action figures and captured emails through a prize draw, Figma produced real toys and a full parody ad, and Sybill pulled 50,000 impressions from one organic post. The versions that fail are fake feature announcements with nothing behind them.
- What is a good B2B April Fools idea?
- A fake product that says something true about how your users actually feel. Figma's FigPals worked because it joked about the loneliness of design work. The test is whether your audience would find it funny even if they did not know your product.
- How long does an April Fools campaign take to produce?
- Around three weeks for anything involving video or physical items, which is why planning usually starts in February. The campaigns that read as effortless are generally the ones that took longest. A text-only post can be written in a day or two.
- What are the risks of an April Fools campaign?
- Reading mean rather than funny, especially if you name a competitor. Confusing customers who cannot find your real product. And joke fatigue, since every brand posts on April 1. Keep a path to your normal site, plan the reveal, and make sure the humour points at a shared frustration rather than at a person.
- Should you name a competitor in an April Fools post?
- Only if you can keep the digs specific and the tone warm. Sybill named Gong and made the criticisms concrete enough that people in the category recognised them, then followed up by thanking the team and moving to shipped features. Vague swipes at a rival read as bitter rather than funny.
Keep reading
9 guerrilla marketing examples that aren't boring
Nine B2B guerrilla plays with real numbers, from a toilet that pulled 40 million views to a sharpie sign that pulled 578 people.
8 OOH Advertising Examples (From $8 to $375K) (2026)
Eight real out-of-home advertising examples with the numbers, from EXPENSIVE billboards to sidewalk chalk that cost a few bucks.
Anthony Po (@anthpo) Lessons on going viral with PR Stunts
Fifty posters started a global lookalike contest. Here is the method behind anthpo's stunts, and the nine lessons worth stealing.
